|
How
Pest Management Strategic Plans
Are Used
Pest Management Strategic Plans
(PMSPs) were developed to make realistic and current information on pest
management practices and needs readily available to the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) for use in regulatory decisions. The role of PMSPs has expanded
into guidance for pest management research, education and
implementation. This fact sheet describes the ways PMSPs benefit pest
management practitioners, educators, regulators, and researchers are not well
publicized.
EPA uses
* Basic understanding of a crop
EPA staff use PMSPs as basic sources of
information about current production practices and pest management in a
particular crop.
* Pesticide registrations
PMSPs are used by staff in the EPA Biological and Economic Analysis
Division when evaluating pesticide registration requests. PMSPs are often
checked to inform the analyst about known pest problems and to identify
chemistries being developed. The availability of this information in a
comprehensive package benefits the efficiency of these evaluations, which is
especially useful for expediting emergency exemption requests.
* Risk assessments
Information in PMSPs about the crop timeline and worker activities is
often consulted to refine occupational risk assessments.
* Benefits assessments and risk
mitigation
EPA uses PMSPs to provide understanding of benefits and costs that arise
from a change in the use pattern of a chemical on a crop. A good example for
this use is the benefits assessments for azinphos-methyl at
http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/op/azm.htm.
Other uses
* Program guidance
University, state and Federal government education and regulatory
programs, as well as commodity and industry associations, need to stay in touch
with client/member needs and priorities. The dialogue among stakeholders that
occurs to create a PMSP is an ideal setting for identifying needs and
priorities, which are recorded in the PMSP document.
*
Support for research proposals
Funding agencies recognize PMSPs as credible documentation of stakeholder
interest. Feedback from target audiences is valuable for initiating and guiding
projects. Being able to cite stakeholder interest has become an
important component for successful funding applications.
* Educational benefit
Working through the pros, cons and other characteristics for all of the
current and potential management options for each major insect, disease, weed
and vertebrate pest of a crop or other IPM setting is no small task. It is also
a great learning experience. It is an opportunity to review one's personal
knowledge and opinion, while comparing and combining it with the experience and
expertise of other people. The result is a broader and deeper understanding of
the crop system, especially the pest management aspects.
* Emergency response
The PMSP process includes discussion of possible responses to potential
new problems such as loss of key pesticide registrations, pesticide resistance,
or new pests. A PMSP is not a fully developed emergency response plan, but it
does serve as a first step.
* Strategic roadmap
Pest managers are busy keeping up with the present. There are
few opportunities for collective focus on strategic planning. Consideration of
reduced risk alternatives and other new technologies is a central part of
creating a PMSP. A PMSP workshop serves as a forum to envision and plan pest
management advances for the future.
* Support for specialty uses
Because of smaller potential sales than large acreage crops such as corn
and soybeans; specialty crops and settings such as vegetables, fruits, forestry,
ornamental plants, greenhouse, and
nursery do not receive the same degree of
private sector investment in crop protection materials. Support for new and
continued registrations of conventional pesticides, reduced risk pesticides, and
biological control agents for these specialty uses is provided by a
government-industry cooperative program called IR-4. Each year about five
specialty crop priorities identified in PMSPs have been given special
consideration through the IR-4 program.
Glen W. Koehler
New England Pest Management Network
November 28, 2005
Acknowledgements:
Editorial comments from the following persons contributed to this
document:
Jonathan Becker, Senior Science Advisor and Nikhil Mallampalli,
Entomologist, Biological and Economic Analysis Division, EPA Office of Pesticide
Programs.
Lynnae Jess, North Central Integrated Pest Management Center, Michigan
State University.
List of grant application benefited by citing PMSPs is from Benefits of
Pest Management Strategic Plans and Crop Profiles, by O. Norman Nesheim &
Russell F. Mizell, III, Southern Region Pest Management Center, University of
Florida. http://www.sripmc.org/CropProfiles/SRPMSPbenefits.htm
|