Pest
 
Resources
 
Online

Link to Biotechnology in pest management infoLink to Crop and Livestock pest infoLink to Health, home indoor and structural pest infoLink to Invasive and Natural resource pest infoLink to Integrated Pest Management infoLink to Organic pest management infoLink to Ornamental, turf and greenhouse pest infoLink to Pesticide Info

link to PRO New England home page

    Info      People      Search     About PRO

 Home
   
Site Map
      What's New

 INFO by Topic
 

Link to Biotechnology in pest management info

  Biotech





 
Link to Crop and Livestock pest infoCrop
& Livestock



 

 

Link to Health, home indoor and structural pest infoHealth
& Indoor


 

 

Link to Invasive and Natural resource pest infoInvasive







 
 


 

Link to Invasive and Natural resource pest info Integrated
Pest Mgmt.

& Biocontrol

 

 

Link to Organic pest management info Organic





 

 




 
Link to Ornamental, turf and greenhouse pest info
  
Ornamental









 
 

Link to Pesticide Info
 
Pesticide


 


 *SEARCH Fact Sheets


 Surveys
   Profiles &
     Strategic plans


  Pest Forecasts
 


 PEOPLE
 with pest answers

""




 
Connecticut
""




 
Massachusetts
""



  
Maine

""




 New Hampshire

""




 
Rhode Island

""






 
Vermont

""

 
 New England
 Region-wide

 


  FEEDBACK



   About PRO

 

 


CROP PROFILES

        The Food Quality Protection Act instructs USDA and EPA to obtain pesticide use data on major and minor crops. Pesticides in the organophosphate and carbamate chemical groups, and any pesticide classified as a possible carcinogen have been identified as top priority for examination by EPA.

        These same pesticides are vital to the production of many New England crops. Because some of these uses may be modified or canceled, it is important to identify where we stand now, where we need to be in the future, and what research efforts are needed to get us there.  In order to better understand where future research pest management efforts should lead, it is necessary first to identify areas of critical need (i.e. those crops or situations where few if any alternative control measures are available to producers).

        Crop Profiles are proving to be very useful in helping USDA and EPA obtain this information.  Each profiles provides the production story for a commodity, including current pest management practices.  Crop profiles show all available options, and also indicate typical pesticide use patterns.  They also include other information, as listed below.

Production Facts:

    • State's ranking in national production of the commodity.
    • States contribution to total US production of that commodity (percent).
    • Yearly production numbers (total acres grown; total acres harvested; cash value).
    • Production costs on a yearly basis.
    • Percent of crop destined for fresh market, processing, feed, etc.
    • Production regions for the commodity within your state.

Cultural Practices:

    • Cultural practices used for producing this commodity (e.g. soil types, irrigation practices, land preparation, planting times, thinning practices, etc.).
    • Intrastate or regional differences if they exist.
    • Worker activities that may occur during the growing season. Include such items as hand weeding, pruning, thinning, spot-treating, mowing, hand-harvesting, hand pollination, etc. This information is very important as EPA is looking at worker re-entry Intervals (REIs) as possible risk mitigation tools.

Insect/Mite Control:

    • Identify and discuss the insect/mite pests on this commodity, include: frequency of occurrence (yearly, sporadic, weather related), the damage they do, percentage of acres infested with the pest (for each growing season or crop cycle), critical timing of control measures, yield losses attributed to each pest, etc.
    • Note any regional differences that may occur within your state.

Chemical Controls:  For each pest discussed above identify the active ingredients that are used to manage that pest, include: chemical name, formulations, percent crop treated, type of application (aerial, ground, chemigation, banded, broadcast, in-furrow etc.), typical application rates, timing (pre-plant, foliar, 5-leaf stage, etc.), typical number of applications per growing season or crop cycle, typical pre-harvest interval, typical reentry intervals, etc.

    • Identify any use of the chemical in IPM programs.
    • Identify any use of the chemical in resistance management programs.
    • Discuss efficacy issues for each active ingredient.

Alternatives:

    • Discuss availability and efficacy issues associated with the alternatives for the pest/pesticide combinations discussed above.

Cultural Control Practices:

    • Identify and discuss any cultural practices (e.g. planting dates, resistant varieties, row spacing) used to manage the pests.

Biological Controls:

    • Discuss any biological control programs that are relevant for the pest/commodity, include pheromone use if applicable.

Post Harvest Control Practices:

    • Discuss any post harvest management practices that are relevant for the pest/commodity; include pre-harvest and/or post harvest practices that are used for post harvest pest management, include storage treatments.

Other issues:

    • Discuss any export or food processor restrictions that may limit the use of a given active ingredient or management practice.
    • Describe on-going research activities that address a possible replacement strategy for the chemical under discussion. If possible discuss time-frame for implementation.
    • Discuss any other relevant issues involving pest management practices used on this commodity.

Weed Control: Follow same format as for insects/mites.

Disease Control: Follow same format as for insects/mites.

Nematode Control: Follow same format as for insects/mites.

 

Key Contacts:

    • Identify commodity experts within your state.

    • Include their phone number and/or email address

Cite References

 
 

 





Link to PRONewEngland home page
   Your feedback through a two-question mini-survey is greatly appreciated!
   Copyright 2007. University of Maine.

The PRO New England name and logo are trademarked in CT, MA, ME, NH, RI and VT.  Federal trademark pending.

Nondiscrimination statement, disability resources, nondisclosure statement.

This site is supported by funding from the Northeastern IPM Center.

Last updated:  January 30, 2012 12:46 PM

Web master:  Glen Koehler, University of Maine Cooperative Extension